You could meticulously plan every question and activity for your qualitative project, but if the right people can’t be found or simply don’t show up, it won’t matter. When the recruitment process isn’t thought through, it leads to delayed timelines, wasted budget, and poor research outcomes.
Thankfully, you can easily employ the following strategies to help with both response and show rates. When these are implemented, your qual project runs more smoothly, and you get the valuable insights you need.
Strategies to Increase Response Rate
1. Select the right methodology.
Certain audiences will do better with certain types of research and knowing that before you begin is a great way to improve your response rates. Some folks may be best suited for virtual interviews and will only respond to those types of opportunities. Others may find in-person to be more comfortable for sharing personal information. Consider the needs and preferences of your audience and choose your methodology accordingly to encourage them to respond.
2. Target your sample as specifically as possible.
Before you even begin the recruitment phase, get extremely clear on who your target audience is. Understanding exactly what you are looking for will increase your initial response, and help minimize respondent fatigue. People are busy, and the research opportunities presented to them need to target their expertise. At TriVoca Health, we see a much higher response rate from participants when they feel their feedback is relevant.
So, if you know you really want diabetic patients using a continuous glucose monitor in the Northeastern US, say so from the outset rather than targeting all diabetic patients across the country. At TriVoca Health, we’re happy to consult with you on creating your screening to ensure you are as specific as possible from the outset.
3. Consider the length of the initial screener.
There’s a simple truth that’s regularly ignored in market research: screeners are crucial to ensure the proper participants are included in a study, so they should be as concise as possible. If an initial survey used to qualify a respondent for a study takes over 20 minutes to complete, they may lose interest, start putting less thought into their answers or stop halfway through. This is especially true in healthcare, as additional requirements such as Sunshine Act disclosures already add time from the outset.
Consider what is most critical to know in a screener and pare back to just those elements. Or, see if you can rework some screener questions to be part of the main study instead so you still get the information, but participants are now incentivized for answering.
Similarly, if a respondent takes the time to go through a lengthy screener only to be put on hold for review, they may not be as willing to respond once there is approval to schedule them.
The consideration of the respondent’s time goes a long way, especially highly researched groups such as oncologists or diabetes patients.
4. Incentivize properly.
This one might seem obvious, but it is overlooked more often than it should be. Take the time to really think through what kind of commitment you are asking of a participant. Sometimes there is only one chance to gain the interest of a busy HCP, KOL, or specialty recruit, and an appropriate incentive is as essential as the topic. When a lower incentive is utilized, the recruitment takes longer and can result in a smaller completed sample size. So, while you might save some money in the short term, it’s costing you more in delayed timelines and less access to the folks you want to talk to.
Even if you are mandated to adhere to Fair Market Value incentives (which are often lower than expectations), find creative ways to make participating more worthwhile. Compensate for travel expenses or provide a meal if the project is in-person. Everyone is busy, and participants need to be properly compensated for their time and opinions.
5. Be creative and specific with your topic.
People need your project to grab their attention. The fight for participant attention is a fierce one, and there is a plethora of bland and generic topics coming their way. Share details of your project objective or take an unusual angle to help your study stand out and drive responses.
Play with your project name to be engaging and specific. For instance, instead of just “Oncology” as a topic, try something like “Understanding Perspectives on Treating Metastatic Breast Cancer.”